radio controlled model boats, R/C, scale, BaD, Dumas, Crockett, Monterey, Warship, ship, model, 1/96, wood, balsa, plank, strip, craftsmanship
but_spacer.gif (865 bytes)
Projects
but_spacer.gif (865 bytes)
hostedbutton.jpg (1265 bytes)
but_spacer.gif (865 bytes)
radio controlled model boats, R/C, scale, BaD, Dumas, Crockett, Monterey, Warship, ship, model, 1/96, wood, balsa, plank, strip, craftsmanship
but_spacer.gif (865 bytes)Gallery
but_spacer.gif (865 bytes)Links
but_spacer.gif (865 bytes)


radio controlled model boats, R/C, scale, BaD, Dumas, Crockett, Monterey, Warship, ship, model, 1/96, wood, balsa, plank, strip, craftsmanship

All about Screws (Propellers)
by Roger Harper
inv_spacer.gif (807 bytes)Backmove.gif (1900 bytes)Ahead
Page 2 of 4

When thinking of propeller efficiency, the controlling factors are really only the thrust and drag that is developed. However, these two factors are influenced by the number of blades, area of the blades, and to a lesser extent, the shape of the blades. 

Pitch and diameter are also generally related, as far as efficiency is concerned.  Best efficiencies usually result from a pitch to diameter ratio of between 0.8 and 1.5, with the optimum being about 1.2 to 1.3.   It is not necessary to go into this in any great detail since propeller "sizing" is invariably based on experience and practical tests with alternate sizes if necessary.

It can be said that any slip in the range of 20 per cent and 80 per cent can be acceptable, although the optimum working range is likely to be between 20 per cent and 50 per cent.  A figure of 25 per cent is a good design goal.  A slip rating of less than 20 per cent is not likely to be a design target, because of the low thrust resulting from the low angle of attack of the blades.  

Propeller Design

Propeller design is largely based on practical experience.  The requirement that each blade of a propeller should be set at an angle consistent with the geometric pitch required.  This was explained earlier.  The actual angle for each part of the blade can be determined by simple geometry, resulting in a progressive "twist" from the root to the tip.

prop2.gif (7746 bytes)

Theoretically, at least the blade angle required at the center is 90, but the center is almost invariably covered by the boss or hub, are relatively ineffective and so are cut away to a  minimum width to reduce drag.   The hub provides both a fixing  the propeller blades, the fixing of the propeller to it's shaft and to form a fairing to smooth the water flow past the propeller.

How Many Blades?

As a generalization, where as a two-bladed propeller is theoretically more efficient than a one with more blades this is commonly offset in practice by the "masking" a propeller normally receives under working conditions.  it is carried on the end of a shaft, supported by a bracket or skeg, masking part of the upper half of the propeller. The following picture shows the masking by the strut or skeg using a two-bladed propeller.
prop3.gif (6552 bytes)

This "masking" is more apparent with a  two-bladed, as only one blade is "unmasked" then the other is "masked".  A three-bladed propeller would always have two bladed "unmasked", and a four-bladed propeller would always have three blades "unmasked".  A four-bladed propeller will thus usually be less efficient than a two-bladed propeller, particularly in model sizes.
prop4.gif (7191 bytes)

A three-bladed propeller would thus appear to be preferred for all applications, although this does not necessarily hold true at high speeds, particularly if higher pitches are also being used.  So, what is better, two or three blades?  The lower form drag of the two-bladed propeller may have a distant advantage, so there really is no real answer to this question.  A change from a two-bladed propeller to a three-bladed propeller of the same diameter and pitch can have a marked effect on performance in many cases; and in others, have very little effect.   It's best to say that two-bladed propellers are to be preferred for high speed work and racing; and a three-bladed propellers are for general applications with both gas engines and electric motors.

Blade Shape

Blade shape can very a lot with individual design.  The general purpose propeller usually has a generous amount of blade area.     A "sweptback" form with the leading edge longer than the trailing edge also appears to be the most efficient form.  With this shape it is often possible to reduce actual blade area while maintaining the thrust developed and increasing efficiency by reducing the drag.  High speed and racing propellers commonly sacrifice some blade area to reduce drag, with further variations on blade shape.

Although inherently less efficient than full sized propellers, model propellers are generally designed with less blade area than their full sized counterparts, although they may follow the same blade shape.  This is because with the small diameters involved there is a likely to be considerable interference between the blades, further reducing efficiency.  To combat this the propeller disc is given more "open" area, generally at least 40%.  This is also desirable since model propellers normally operate at rpm figures far higher than their full sized counterparts, again favoring more open area to minimize interference between the blades.

Blade Form

This can be as important as blade shape.   In fact, a good blade section can often compensate for poor blade shape.   Regardless of

You  can  send a tip here, or send Email to: rktman56@yahoo.com

Home Contact Me Discussion Group

Copyright 2001 RKTMAN
Website Designed & Maintained By RKTMAN